I am not sure what “switch was flipped” but in the past few weeks I have been totally reinvigorated about certification. Maybe what happened is I passed through the typical stages…you know them:
Stage 1: I don’t know what I don’t know: This led to an overconfidence of my abilities and made certification seem easily within reach.
Stage 2: I know what I don’t know: This was the scary time, especially at the beginning. It was a time when it seemed like there was so much to know that I couldn’t possibly ever be qualified to be certified, much less write the portfolio for submission.
Stage 3: I know what I know. I am not at this stage yet. I definitely feel like I am in the middle of Stage 2 but “feel like” I can see the “light at the end of the tunnel.”
So, what pulled me out of this crisis of conscience? Action! Taking the ProGen course helped a lot. (I am on lesson 8 of 19) and holding my own. In one week I will start start the 8 week course based on Mastering Genealogical Proof by Tom Jones and mentored by Karen Stanbury. In January I will be attending the Salt Lake Institute for Genealogy’s class Advanced Methodologies taught by Tom Jones. I am looking forward to all of these opportunities to improve my skills.
But, those are looking forward…ie. they are the “light at the end of the tunnel.” What has happened that has made me get to the point where I can even see the light? (at some point this metaphor will run its course!). There were a number of things.
The article on Grietje Wientjes and her sister Eda being accepted in the Illinois State Genealogy Quarterly was definitely an ego boost when I really needed it. I also had a long talk with the Publications Editor of the Quarterly and her issues were my issues for the SGS Bulletin…..I think the various publications chairs would be a very supportive community if we could tap into it in a more organized way. She, too, was taking ProGen, so we had much to talk about. In addition, I received a very nice note from Judy Russell (The Legal Genealogist) who was very supportive of what I had written and who encouraged me to apply.
I am working very hard at ProGen and really want to bring my “A-game” to the group. There seems to be 3 or 4 of us in our cohort that have these same goals. We work hard, critique using BCG standards and just “take it.” It’s working.
I have started writing the Case Study….I realized that I was making the determination of the problem too hard. I thought I didn’t have any unresolved issues (Stage 1) but as soon as I got a good (better?) handle on the Genealogical Process Map I realized that every relationship qualifies, it’s just that some are more challenging than others. I picked one with conflicting direct evidence and I am writing, writing, writing.
While I haven’t decided for sure which of my family lines to use for the Kinship Determination Project. I have several good ones I could use, even after publishing Grietje Wientjes. While I could extract her section from my submission exactly, I think that I will probably not do that.
What I have done since the last posting: Prepped for my MGP class, writing a great blog on Mrs. Frank Bunce (d. 1881) which will not be posted until January (you’ll know why when you read the posting.), cleaned my office because of my aunt’s visit, reading about Swedish emigration/immigration, trying to find any published materials other than OGSA’s on the Ostfriesens (not finding anything), sewed 6 cute linen tops–with adorable buttons. Attended a conference in San Diego for my “day job”. started getting ready for a speaking gig for SGS on self publishing (note: the 210 hardbound books arrived just in time for the big event for my client–woo hoo!) , worked with Puget Sound Association of Professional Genealogists to determine the viability of submitting a program to UW continuing education which would revamp the program. It will be presented tomorrow. Played golf with hubby.