Part 2: When there is No Drama… DNA Standards

DNA EamesOn 27 October, the Board for Certification of Genealogists announced a pending change in the rubrics and theGenealogy Standardsrelating to the incorporation of DNA into portfolios for  certification and our every day documentation.[1]This caused a renewed conversation in various groups about the issue and how to best incorporate this information into our writing when DNA was substantiating our lineages and where DNA research was not the principal vehicle for solving a relationship problem.

The concern was amongst some that this added requirement meant that people who were on the clock had to find a “big problem” to solve using DNA—an adoptee, and unknown father, etc. While that is one aspect of the use of DNA, the majority of our work is done with families that do not have “big problems” to solve. So, what does it look like when we try to add the information contained from our DNA matches to prove relationships when there is no “big problem.”

I have been thinking about how to record the DNA information found which substantiates my “paper tree” since I attended Institute for Genealogical & Historical Research (IGHR) this summer in Athens, Georgia. With no “big problem” to solve, I spent a week focused on using DNA to document my Swedish line. But, what are my next steps and how would I incorporate that information into my portfolio.

I identified seven steps to adding DNA evidence to an existing family lineage that has no drama. My approach assumes that you have a low level working knowledge of DNA, and that you have tested at Ancestry. I encourage you to learn more.

Disclaimer: This is only an example of how I would incorporate the evidence offered by DNA if I had to do my portfolio over. I have no idea if my “solution” would be acceptable or not. Guidance on the topic is slim, but I am using the press release to guide my DNA documentation, because it is all I have at the time of writing. Also, this field is changing so rapidly that this post will be “old news” in a very short period of time, but may still provide the future reader with a perspective and help them formulate questions they might not have thought of.

Here are the seven parts. Each will be a separate blog post.

  • Part 1: Problem identification
  • Part 2: Understanding the rubrics and the Genealogy Standards.
  • Part 3: Identifying possible matches
  • Part 4: Crafting citations
  • Part 5: Analysis and Correlation
  • Part 6: Entering the data into my RootMagic database
  • Part 7: Writing it up!

Let’s improve our understanding of the rubrics and associate Genealogical Standards. Since at this time they have not been officially published I am operating with very little information other than the press release.

What follows is as posted on their website.[2]

Board for Certification of Genealogists Adopts Standards for DNA Evidence

On 21 October 2018, the Board for the Certification of Genealogists (BCG) approved five modified and seven new standards relating to the use of DNA evidence in genealogical work. BCG also updated the Genealogist’s Code to address the protection of people who provide DNA samples.

The new measures are intended to assist the millions of family historians who now turn to genetic sources to establish kinships. The action followed a public comment period on proposed standards released by BCG earlier this year.

“BCG firmly believes the standards must evolve to incorporate this new type of evidence,” according to BCG President Richard G. Sayre. “Associates, applicants, and the public should know BCG respects DNA evidence. It respects the complexity of the evidence and the corresponding need for professional standards. BCG does not expect use of DNA to be demonstrated in every application for certification. However, all genealogists, including applicants, need to make sound decisions about when DNA can or should be used, and any work products that incorporate it should meet the new standards and ethical provisions.”

“Standards for Using DNA Evidence,” a new chapter to be incorporated in Genealogy Standards, introduces the issues this way:

“Meeting the Genealogical Proof Standard requires using all available and relevant types of evidence. DNA evidence both differs from and shares commonalities with documentary evidence. Like other types of evidence, DNA evidence is not always available, relevant, or usable for a specific problem, is not used alone, and involves planning, analyzing, drawing conclusions, and reporting. Unlike other types of evidence, DNA evidence usually comes from people now living.”

In brief[1], the new standards address seven areas:

  • Planning DNA tests.The first genetic standard describes the qualities of an effective plan for DNA testing including types of tests, testing companies, and analytical tools. It also calls for selecting the individuals based on their DNA’s potential to answer a research question.
  • Analyzing DNA test results. The second genetic standard covers factors that might impact a genetic relationship conclusion, including analysis of pedigrees, documentary research, chromosomal segments, and mutations, markers or regions; also, composition of selected comparative test takers and genetic groups.
  • Extent of DNA evidence.The third genetic standard describes the qualities needed for sufficiently extensive DNA data.
  • Sufficient verifiable data.The fourth genetic standard addresses the verifiability of data used to support conclusions.
  • Integrating DNA and documentary evidence.The fifth genetic standard calls for a combination of DNA and documentary evidence to support a conclusion about a genetic relationship. It also calls for analysis of all types of evidence.
  • Conclusions about genetic relationships.The sixth genetic standard defines the parameters of a genetic relationship and the need for accurate representation of genealogical conclusions.
  • Respect for privacy rights.The seventh genetic standard describes the parameters of informed consent.

The modifications made to several existing standards call for:

  • Documentation of sources for each parent-child link.
  • Where appropriate, distinction among adoptive, foster, genetic, step, and other kinds of familial relationships.
  • Use of graphics as aids, for example: genealogical charts and diagrams to depict proved or hypothesized relationships; or lists and tables to facilitate correlation of data and demonstrate patterns or conflicts in evidence.
  • Explanations of deficiencies when research is insufficient to reach a conclusion.

A new edition of Genealogy Standards is expected to be ready by next March. A new application guide and judging rubrics incorporating the new standards will be released at about the same time. In the interim, portfolios submitted for consideration for certification will be evaluated using the existing Genealogy Standards.

[1] The Board for Certification of Genealogists® (BCG) contractually granted the publisher of Genealogy Standards the exclusive right to copy, publish and distribute the standards including amendments. However, BCG-certified associates have the contractual right to include reasonable portions of the standards in presentations, articles, blog posts, social media, and the like. In no case may BCG or its associates allow the standards to be published in their entirety because the publisher deems that competitive to its publication rights.

The words Certified Genealogist and the designation CG are registered certification marks and the designations Certified Genealogical Lecturer and CGL are service marks of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by board-certified associates after periodic competency evaluations, and the board name is registered in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

We will revisit these again at the end of the series to determine if the approach taken complies.

Next:
Part 3: Identifying possible matches in the family line of interest

[1]Board for Certification of Genealogists, “Standards for DNA Evidence,” press release,  (https://bcgcertification.org/standards-for-dna-evidence/: accessed 31 October 2018), press release as posted on website.

[2]Board for Certification of Genealogists, “Standards for DNA Evidence,” press release,  (https://bcgcertification.org/standards-for-dna-evidence/: accessed 31 October 2018), press release as posted on website.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s